Senators act to protect IVF treatments

While the codification perspectives of Roe v. Wade in federal law faces big hurdles as Democrats on Capitol Hill push for protections for fertility treatments like in vitro fertilization (IVF), which involves fertilizing multiple eggs. The senses. Patty Murray and Tammy Duckworth on Thursday introduced a bill to ban limitations on assisted reproductive technologies.

After the Supreme Court overturned the federal abortion law Earlier this year, advocates raised concerns about the future of popular fertility treatments like in vitro fertilization. They worry that state legislation with vague language and so-called personality bills threaten the practice.

The new legislation, according to its authors, would prohibit individuals from limiting access to reproductive technologies, protect the health care providers who administer them, require the Department of Justice to take action against violating states, and create a “private right of action” for patients and health. healthcare providers in states where reproductive technologies are limited.

“Our bill will guarantee every family in America that they can get IVF services without being denied it,” Murray told CBS News. “What we’ve seen since the ruling is chaos in this country, doctors don’t know what they can do. We’re actually seeing Republican lawmakers already considering banning IVF.”

Duckworth has been open about her use of IVF to conceive her two children, and she was the first senator to give birth while in office.

Murray told CBS News they were courting Republican votes and urged former Vice President Mike Pence to push his party members on the issue. In an interview with CBS News’ Margaret Brennan last month, pence said, “I fully support fertility treatments and believe they deserve the protection of the law,” revealed Pence, a staunch opponent of abortion, his wife underwent IVF. “They brought us great comfort during those long and difficult years of battling infertility in our marriage.”

The patchwork of abortion laws following Roe v. Wade calls for greater clarity around the impact of fertility treatments. According to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, many “state laws also include definitions that ‘personality’ begins at fertilization. Overly broad language and statutory definitions could – intentionally or unintentionally – imply and even prohibit IVF and some others [assisted reproductive technology] procedures.”

Access to abortion proved to be a major issue during the midterm elections and outweighed concerns about the economy in some states. Democrats urged voters to elect more Democrats to the Senate to codify Roe into law. But even if the party retained control of the Senate, federal abortion protections remain highly unlikely without a stronger majority. And in January, Republicans will control the House.

In an interview with CBS News, Murray acknowledged that codifying Roe “is going to be a battle” and that federal legislation to address access “is probably going to be a long-term effort.” But she noted that “every state that had a choice question on the ballot choice won. And voters are saying so. And if Republicans continue to deny this or push this chaos, they’ll see the fallout in the next few months.” elections”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *